Tuesday 15 May 2012

Evaluation


Evaluating

This is my overall evaluation for my project. I am going to look back at each stage of my project and evaluate how well I have done and what I could maybe improve if ever comes a next time.
Research
To start off with, I was given a brief in which I had to  complete my own photos in the style of an photographer. The theme this time around was documentary photography. Which is basically what the title says, It is when you document things around you, and turn them into photos. Sometimes they have meaning. Sometimes they mean memories. So I thought it would be very interesting to see what I could come up with.
To start with I had to chose a photographer. I instantly chose Nan Goldin when I found her on a list of photographers on a Wikipedia page. I liked her style. I liked the way the photos looked and I liked how cultural and how brave her photos were. Some of her photos were quite raunchy and quite explicit. But there was more to her that I saw. And  the other thing about her photos I liked were how young they were. And how I could do something with her style, and still make my photos my own. The first step was conducting research on her. That did not just mean reading her life story, but also looking at her photos. The colours, the tones, the shots, and everything like that.

Taking the photos
My challenge after conducting research was taking the photos. I had to take five photos in the style of Nan and then take one re- enactment photo. I knew what re-enactment photo I wanted to do. It was the first picture I had ever saw of her, and it was the one that made me want to use her for my project.
When it came to taking the pictures it was about getting the right time. Nan’s pictures are a mixture of staged photos (where for example the people are smiling towards the camera) and non-staged photos (for example when people are doing different things and Nan just takes the picture of the doing it.) So I did a mixture of both. I told the people I was going to take a picture of them because some people may have not wanted their picture taken, but sometimes I would tell them to carry on with what they were doing and sometimes I would tell them to pose for the camera, or look into the camera. For example the two pictures I took of my friend Louise, one I asked her to pose for the camera and the other I told her to carry on doing her makeup.
When it came to editing them I looked at the colours  Nan uses contrasting colours a lot as I saw. Sometimes her pictures had a warm feeling to them. For example using oranges and yellows, and some of her pictures gave off a colder feel for example she used blues and greens. I thought when it came to taking my photos I wanted to establish those differences.

What went well and improvements.
So what went well? I think I was really proud of my analysing. I have always been good at analysing things, but when it came to looking at Nan’s photos I could see so much. That’s the great thing about documentary photography, because these pictures these photographers are taking mean something to them. And you can see it in their work. It was liked a learned something about Nan and that was really something I liked.
Improvement wise, I think I could of improved my pictures. There is always room for improvement. I could of been a bit more daring maybe. I could of asked people to do more..But I think that is something to look at in the future.

Conclusion
I had a lot of fun on this project. I learned a lot of things I did not know and I had fun taking the photos. There are room for improvements and if I ever get to go back to this in the future. I would defiantly try some new things.
Word count - 705

Sunday 13 May 2012

My 5 Photos








These are my 5 photos that are in the style of Nan Goldin. Two of them. (The one of me and the second one of Louise) were kinda staged but the others were took when people were doing everyday tasks. Of course I had to ask for their permission to take the photos. But I asked them to carry on with what they were doing so they would look good. The last photo was taken by my friend ages ago of me but When I edited it a few months ago I thought it looked really like Nan Goldin's work.


Sunday 6 May 2012

Some of her photos





These are an example of some of her photos. Most of them are documented, from when she has been around to take them. Which is what mine will be similar too. However one like the wolf one is her more staged worked. All and all they do carry the same eccentric style.

About Chosen Artist


Nan Goldin: Who is she?
Nan Goldin is an American documentary photographer. She was born in 1953 Washington DC. Nan was born in Washington DC. However she grew up living in Boston, Massachusetts  and was born into a Jewish family household. 
At the age of 15 was the first time Nan had held a camera. Nan was part of the Satya Community school, in Lincoln. She referred to the school as a ‘hippie’ school, and said how free spirited it was and how you could pretty much do whatever you wanted to do in the school. Nan was given a camera to try out by one of her teachers, and this is when she found her love for photography.
Goldin graduated university in 1977. In which she then started progressing in her photography. She moved to New York City and this is where most of her photos are set, as she was interested in subcultures around New York throughout the ages. Especially in the 90’s when there were different cyber punk, oddly glamorous type cliques. Like every photographer, she had a style...
Whats her style?
Nan Goldin’s style of photography is known as documentary photography. Overall, documentary photography is just like documentary films. They are documenting a particular part of something. For most photographers this is documenting something they find intriguing or maybe documenting memories or something in they’re life. (source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Documentary_photography) It’s easy to understand what is meant by documentary photography. It is not just taking a picture. Every picture has a style. This is a huge convention in photography and this is how photographers become well known. So documentary photography has a theme. So of course Nan Goldin had a style to her photos. Nan’s style is just this. Nan is known for documenting her life, her friends and things she saw around her. She was known for taking pictures of her friends, the gay and transsexual community and the cyber punk era, like said above.
Her work can sometimes be somewhat controversial. Sometimes her pictures can be sometimes sexually explicit and also according to some people ‘glamorizing drugs’ especially the use of heroin. Goldin actually had censorship problems when her work was shown in Brazil as the pictures were too explicit to put up, due to minors being there, however they will still shown. Her work was moved in Feb 2012, to her own exhibition, so people could have the choice, weather they wanted to see her photos.
 It also needs to be said that her pictures were mainly token in the 90’s era. A lot of her pictures have quite a club kid feel to them. And you can tell this from the appearance of the people in the pictures.
The good thing about Nan’s pictures is that they are overall visual, and what I mean by that is that her pictures are interesting to look at and interesting to view. Her pictures went quickly into being lengthy slideshows, for example, one of her slideshows she had 800 of her photos and was shown in a 45 minute time slot. And it is by far her most famous. She has also done lots of exhibitions, Like said above. Lots of her exhibitions were disturbing. Another one of her exhibitions was called Sisters, Saints and Sybils. Out of all her exhibitions and slideshows this was her most cinematic piece of work. It had a more deeper story than any of her other pictures, that showed day to day life of her. In fact the story behind the images was about the suicide of her sister Barbra. The photos were turned into moving images, to create a story.   

Word count: - 616